<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discard candidate merge changesets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://intovsts.net/2012/08/30/discard-candidate-merge-changesets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://intovsts.net/2012/08/30/discard-candidate-merge-changesets/</link>
	<description>blogging about Application Lifecycle Management with Team Foundation Server</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 10:11:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pietergheysens</title>
		<link>http://intovsts.net/2012/08/30/discard-candidate-merge-changesets/#comment-1844</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pietergheysens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://intovsts.wordpress.com/?p=705#comment-1844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[a new changeset will indeed be created, but it will not pop up as a candidate changeset for merging in the other direction if no additional changes have been applied in the same changeset!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a new changeset will indeed be created, but it will not pop up as a candidate changeset for merging in the other direction if no additional changes have been applied in the same changeset!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oran</title>
		<link>http://intovsts.net/2012/08/30/discard-candidate-merge-changesets/#comment-1830</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oran]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 08:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://intovsts.wordpress.com/?p=705#comment-1830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the post, it’s really helpful but I have one question.

Because it’s still required to check in the change on the “target” branch (even though there are in fact no changes) TFS creates a new changeset on the “target” branch which then appears as a merge candidate for a reverse merge.

Seems to me like it’s only moving the problem from one place to another. Am I missing something?

Thanks

Oran]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post, it’s really helpful but I have one question.</p>
<p>Because it’s still required to check in the change on the “target” branch (even though there are in fact no changes) TFS creates a new changeset on the “target” branch which then appears as a merge candidate for a reverse merge.</p>
<p>Seems to me like it’s only moving the problem from one place to another. Am I missing something?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Oran</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
