<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Gated Check-in build in TFS2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://intovsts.net/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://intovsts.net/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/</link>
	<description>blogging about the current and upcoming release(s) of Visual Studio Team System</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:21:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The importance of Continuous Building/Integration - Microsoft Developer Network (MSDN) Belux Team Blog - Site Home - MSDN Blogs</title>
		<link>http://intovsts.net/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/#comment-1428</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The importance of Continuous Building/Integration - Microsoft Developer Network (MSDN) Belux Team Blog - Site Home - MSDN Blogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intovsts.wordpress.com/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/#comment-1428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that since TFS 2010, there is also the Gated Check-in trigger option that will even prevent broken builds by delaying the actual commit until a successful build was run [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that since TFS 2010, there is also the Gated Check-in trigger option that will even prevent broken builds by delaying the actual commit until a successful build was run [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The importance of Continuous Building/Integration &#171; Into Visual Studio Team System</title>
		<link>http://intovsts.net/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/#comment-1422</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The importance of Continuous Building/Integration &#171; Into Visual Studio Team System]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 21:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intovsts.wordpress.com/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/#comment-1422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that since TFS 2010, there is also the Gated Check-in trigger option that will even prevent broken builds by delaying the actual commit until a successful build was run [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that since TFS 2010, there is also the Gated Check-in trigger option that will even prevent broken builds by delaying the actual commit until a successful build was run [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Gated Check-in build in TFS2010 &#124; ramprasadm</title>
		<link>http://intovsts.net/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gated Check-in build in TFS2010 &#124; ramprasadm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 15:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intovsts.wordpress.com/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/#comment-1112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Gated Check-in build in TFS2010  http://intovsts.net/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Gated Check-in build in TFS2010  <a href="http://intovsts.net/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/" rel="nofollow">http://intovsts.net/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ugur</title>
		<link>http://intovsts.net/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/#comment-892</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ugur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intovsts.wordpress.com/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/#comment-892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Pieter,

Thanks for your response. Anyway, i&#039;m talking about my own changes which is originated by me. Exclusive check-out is enabled on our team project. As you know &quot;Preserve my changes locally&quot; option is disabled on gated checkin screen. When gated checkin build finishes successfully, reconcile doesn&#039;t work. It says &quot;no changes to reconcile&quot;. But i&#039;m the person who made the check-in and i want to get latest code automatically by reconcilation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pieter,</p>
<p>Thanks for your response. Anyway, i&#8217;m talking about my own changes which is originated by me. Exclusive check-out is enabled on our team project. As you know &#8220;Preserve my changes locally&#8221; option is disabled on gated checkin screen. When gated checkin build finishes successfully, reconcile doesn&#8217;t work. It says &#8220;no changes to reconcile&#8221;. But i&#8217;m the person who made the check-in and i want to get latest code automatically by reconcilation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pietergheysens</title>
		<link>http://intovsts.net/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/#comment-891</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pietergheysens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intovsts.wordpress.com/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/#comment-891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ugur: to get a latest version that didn&#039;t originate from your changes, you will always need to request a &quot;get latest&quot; manually. You are always in control for your workspaces. Reconcile actions are only possible for your own changes/shelvesets.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ugur: to get a latest version that didn&#8217;t originate from your changes, you will always need to request a &#8220;get latest&#8221; manually. You are always in control for your workspaces. Reconcile actions are only possible for your own changes/shelvesets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ugur</title>
		<link>http://intovsts.net/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/#comment-890</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ugur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intovsts.wordpress.com/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/#comment-890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You said that:
&quot;If you did not choose to preserve the changes locally, there won’t be any changes to reconcile after the Gated Check-in build, even if you forced the reconciliation.&quot;

Why? I want to get latest version of code from source control otherwise i have to get the latest version of code manually. Neither build failed or succeeded i can reconcile my workspace.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You said that:<br />
&#8220;If you did not choose to preserve the changes locally, there won’t be any changes to reconcile after the Gated Check-in build, even if you forced the reconciliation.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why? I want to get latest version of code from source control otherwise i have to get the latest version of code manually. Neither build failed or succeeded i can reconcile my workspace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonard Woody</title>
		<link>http://intovsts.net/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leonard Woody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intovsts.wordpress.com/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/#comment-828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice article!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rune</title>
		<link>http://intovsts.net/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rune]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intovsts.wordpress.com/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/#comment-799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the article, but i have a question which I can&#039;t find answer on anywhere... Is there possible to change NoCICheckInComment in 2010? In 2008 it was done in the msbuild file, but since 2010 uses WF, where can we do this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article, but i have a question which I can&#8217;t find answer on anywhere&#8230; Is there possible to change NoCICheckInComment in 2010? In 2008 it was done in the msbuild file, but since 2010 uses WF, where can we do this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micha Ben-Efraim</title>
		<link>http://intovsts.net/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Micha Ben-Efraim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intovsts.wordpress.com/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/#comment-754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you check the PRESERVE check box, the changes files will remain checked out in your workspace. If these are checked out EXCLUSIVE, the gated check in will fail as it will not able to pull these locked sources.
As far as I saw, when you have exclusively locked files, TFS doesn&#039;t give you the option preserving local changes as it doesn&#039;t make sense (check in will fail).

Therefore I assume your problem is is the exclusive lock]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you check the PRESERVE check box, the changes files will remain checked out in your workspace. If these are checked out EXCLUSIVE, the gated check in will fail as it will not able to pull these locked sources.<br />
As far as I saw, when you have exclusively locked files, TFS doesn&#8217;t give you the option preserving local changes as it doesn&#8217;t make sense (check in will fail).</p>
<p>Therefore I assume your problem is is the exclusive lock</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberjo</title>
		<link>http://intovsts.net/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roberjo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intovsts.wordpress.com/2010/04/18/the-gated-check-in-build-in-tfs2010/#comment-753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have set up gated check-in as well as single signout/exclusive checkout.  Now when my users try to run a gated check-in, the option to &quot;Preserve my pending changes locally&quot; cannot be checked (greyed out/disabled and unchecked).  Any ideas why this happens?  I need to be able to preserve local changes so my users do not have to search for their shelveset and wrestle with unshelving changes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have set up gated check-in as well as single signout/exclusive checkout.  Now when my users try to run a gated check-in, the option to &#8220;Preserve my pending changes locally&#8221; cannot be checked (greyed out/disabled and unchecked).  Any ideas why this happens?  I need to be able to preserve local changes so my users do not have to search for their shelveset and wrestle with unshelving changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

